is unlikely to be achieved via the standard methodologies of contemporary epistemology. Abrol Fairweather and Linda Zagzebski, 200-213. "Epistemic Folkways and Scientific Epistemology Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press). A second group of virtue epistemologists conceives of intellectual virtues, not as cognitive faculties or abilities like memory and vision, but rather as good intellectual character traits, traits like inquisitiveness, fair-mindedness, open-mindedness, intellectual carefulness, thoroughness, and tenacity. Would seem frequently to depend more, or at least more saliently, on rather different qualities, many of which are excellences of intellectual character. Several areas of contextual epistemology attack the problem of knowledge from a very objective standpoint. But this is possible, Montmarquet argues, only if we can hold the person responsible for the beliefs that permitted the action.
References and Further Reading Aristotle. Selected bibliography edit Aquino, Frederick.
Grading rubric short essay
Privilege essay conclusion
Zagzebski claims that knowledge is belief arising from "acts of intellectual virtue." An act of intellectual virtue is an act that gets everything right: it involves having an intellectually virtuous motive, doing what an intellectually virtuous person would do in the situation, and reaching the. And many of these are the very traits of interest to the virtue responsibilist. Zagzebski, Linda (1998, 2005). This complicates any account of the apparent prospects of virtue responsibilism, since these prospects are likely to vary from one virtue responsibilist view to another. Virtue epistemologists can be divided into two groups.
Quoting things in an essay, An essay on man epistle 1 cliff notes,